Àá½Ã¸¸ ±â´Ù·Á ÁÖ¼¼¿ä. ·ÎµùÁßÀÔ´Ï´Ù.

»ç¶÷Żȸ»ó¾Æ±âÁú Á¦ÀÛÀ» À§ÇÑ Å»È¸¹æ¹ý ºñ±³¿¬±¸ - 2% HNO3°ú 0.6 N HCl ºñ±³ -

Comparative study of mineralization methods for making human demineralized dentin matrix - comparison 2% HNO3 and 0.6 N HCl -

Journal of Dental Implant Research 2012³â 31±Ç 1È£ p.20 ~ 25
ȲȫÁØ, ±è¿µ¿í, ¸ðµ¿¿±, ÀÌÀå·Ä, ±èÇöö, ÀÌ»óö,
¼Ò¼Ó »ó¼¼Á¤º¸
ȲȫÁØ ( Hwang Hong-Jun ) - ¸®ºùÀ£Ä¡°úº´¿ø ±¸°­¾Ç¾È¸é¿Ü°ú
±è¿µ¿í ( Kim Yeong-Wook ) - ¸®ºùÀ£Ä¡°úº´¿ø ±¸°­¾Ç¾È¸é¿Ü°ú
¸ðµ¿¿± ( Mo dong-Yub ) - ¸®ºùÀ£Ä¡°úº´¿ø ±¸°­¾Ç¾È¸é¿Ü°ú
ÀÌÀå·Ä ( Lee Jang-Yeol ) - ¸®ºùÀ£Ä¡°úº´¿ø ±¸°­¾Ç¾È¸é¹æ»ç¼±°ú
±èÇöö ( Kim Hyun-Chull ) - ¸®ºùÀ£Ä¡°úº´¿ø ±¸°­¾Ç¾È¸é¿Ü°ú
ÀÌ»óö ( Lee Sang-Chull ) - ¸®ºùÀ£Ä¡°úº´¿ø ±¸°­¾Ç¾È¸é¿Ü°ú

Abstract


Purpose:The aim of this study is finding more efficient demineralizing method through comparision 2% HNO3 and 0.6 N HCl.

Materials and Methods: A human demineralized dentin matrix (DDM) was prepared from extracted molars. The molars were particulated and its size varied from 0.5 to 1 mm. The particles were demineralized by 2% HNO3 or 0.6 N HCl. The weights of particles were measured and the radiographs were taken before and after the demineralization. And also decrementof inorganic matter was analyzed.

Results: Mean weight loss was 52.5%, 45% in HNO3, HCl, respectively. Radiographically, the image of the particles in HNO3 lost more radiopacity than the particles in HCl. 2% HNO3 showed further reduction of inorganic components (Ca, P) more than 0.6 N HCl.

Conclusion: This result showed that HNO3 is more efficient material than HCl for tooth demineralization. Further long term evaluation via prospectively designed studies are needed.

Å°¿öµå

Autogenous demineralized dentin matrix; 2% HNO3; 0.6 N HCl

¿ø¹® ¹× ¸µÅ©¾Æ¿ô Á¤º¸

 

µîÀçÀú³Î Á¤º¸